You do not have Javascript enabled. Some elements of this website may not work correctly.

About this talk



EA Global: San Francisco 2019

In this academic session, Zach Groff, a PhD student at Stanford University whose research areas include welfare economics, discusses a 1995 paper which argued that nature contains more suffering than enjoyment. After analyzing the model used in that paper, Groff found that an error negated its original conclusion, and that evolutionary dynamics imply that enjoyment may predominate for some species. In addition to this result, Groff also discusses suggestions for the empirical study of wild animal welfare.

Read a transcript